The Topic of Discussion
Democrats won’t stand up for a 13-year-old cancer survivor, but they will kneel for a criminal.
as of 2025.03.08 | Team Uncle | Nephew |
Questions Answered | 0 | 0 |
Questions Asked | 0 | 8 |
Information Acknowledged | 1.5 | 7 |
Information Provided | 1 | 10 |
Information Unrelated | 6 | 0 |
The shared post shows the following:
An edited image of Elizabeth Warren holding a sign with the text “We won’t stand up for a 13 yr old cancer survivor.”, followed by a line that reads, “But Democrats will kneel for a criminal”, followed by an image showing Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and other participants kneeling on the marble floor of Emancipation Hall in the U.S. Capitol. The original poster adds, “Sums it up perfectly.”
Context:
Facebook Conversation Breakdown:
Nephew: +3 Information
Don’t forget, Trump often uses emotional stories to shape public perception and divert attention from substantive issues. He highlights sensitive examples to portray himself as caring and compassionate, and when his opponents don’t support him, he claims they are heartless.1 This tactic is particularly effective because many of his supporters are swayed more by how they feel than by objective facts. By exploiting these narratives, he rallies his base and shifts the focus from policy details to a simplistic portrayal of who cares and who doesn’t. Keep an eye out for this, and don’t fall for it.
Also, the fact that Republicans claim to care about anything “criminal” is simply laughable. They voted for an actual convicted felon.2
Person: +1 Acknowledged, +1 Information, +1 Unrelated
You sound like just another typical lib, believing everyone else is stupid…
That picture of pelosi and company kneeling for george floyd. News flash, he was an actual, hardened felon…
Nephew: +2 Acknowledged, +4 Information
๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ญ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐, ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ข๐…
I didn’t mention anything about intelligence or say that anyone is stupid. I was simply discussing a political messaging tactic, specifically the use of emotional stories to divert attention from the facts and policy issues. It seems that the response you’re having might be coming from your own perspective on the issue. My aim is to focus on the tactic itself, not to judge anyone’s intelligence or feelings.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ค๐ง๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฒ๐. ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ก, ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ, ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ง…
I mentioned that the fact Republicans claim to care about anything “criminal” is laughable because they voted for an actual convicted felon. This comment was aimed at highlighting the hypocrisy of being upset over one criminal matter while ignoring another. The kneeling gesture was a symbolic act intended to call attention to the broader issues of justice and systemic inequality. Focusing solely on George Floyd’s past criminal record oversimplifies a complex situation and distracts from the deeper systemic issues that the gesture was meant to address.
Person: +0.5 Acknowledged, +5 Unrelated
There is no systemic racism in america. The libs just use it as a political cudgel.. Is many libs ticket hook line and sinker. … You libs are not the Bill Clinton Democrats Is worthy a voting for…
And to think you voted for kamala…. As the former administration drove this country in the ground…. Quit embarrassing yourself. you should consider voting on policy that works for American’s as whole… Keeping in mind, With ninety percent of the media,, Between biden and harris, A billion and a half dollars,The world against a singular person.
Common sense prevailed over all of that!…
Nephew: +8 Questions, +5 Acknowledged, +3 Information
Though you seem to be steering the conversation heavily away from the topic at hand, I’m open to addressing these points you’ve brought up.
> ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐ฏ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฐ๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐น.. ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ.
I guess I’m not following here, you may be conflating systemic racism with systemic inequality. If systemic racism doesn’t exist in America, in what way do you feel the “libs” are using it as a political cudgel?
> ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ…
I’m not sure what you mean by comparing today’s “libs” with the Bill Clinton Democrats. Are you saying that modern liberal policies, including discussions about systemic inequality, are less electable? How does this difference in political style affect the ability to solve real issues? I’d prefer to judge policies by their results rather than by nostalgic labels. If I’ve deciphered your point incorrectly, please clarify.
> ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ธ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ…. ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ…. ๐ค๐๐ถ๐ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ.
People have different policy priorities, and opinions can change over time as new issues and facts come to light. Can you point to specific policies that you believe drove the country in the ground, and do you think people can change their stance based on new circumstances? I believe it’s more constructive to discuss actual issues rather than make sweeping insults.
> ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป’๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ฒ… ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ป ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ, ๐ช๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ,, ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ถ๐, ๐ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐,๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ผ๐ป.
Could you clarify what you mean? Are you suggesting that voters should focus on policies that benefit all Americans rather than getting caught up in media narratives or the financial backing behind certain candidates? It would also be helpful to know which specific policies or issues you feel are most important when voting.
> ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐!…
Could you explain what you mean by “common sense prevailed” in this context? What specific decisions or policies do you see as embodying that common sense, and why do you believe they led to a better outcome?
- Virtue signalling – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_signalling โฉ๏ธ
- They voted for an actual convicted felon – https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-convicted-felonies/ โฉ๏ธ